Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eric Quigley vs Peter Polansky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Quigley vs Polansky analysis and find out who is favored!
Eric Quigley vs Peter Polansky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Quigley 1 - 1 Polansky
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Quigley has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Polansky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Quigley, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Polansky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Quigley has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Polansky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Quigley has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Polansky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Quigley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 120/ 96), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Polansky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 82/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 11/ 21).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Quigley winning 1 times and Polansky being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Quigley winning 3 and Polansky winning 3. The last match between Quigley and Polansky was at the Granby Challenger, 23-07-2015, Second, Hard with Eric Quigley getting the victory 6-3 0-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Quigley and Polansky have played a deciding set 2 times, with Quigley winning 1 times and Polansky 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Quigley winning 0, and Polansky 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Quigley has played against opponents with an average rank of while Polansky has played against players with an average rank of 269.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Quigley has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Polansky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Quigley has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Polansky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
297
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
721
Rank
110
High
35
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
54% (197-171)
Career Total W/L
56% (541-428)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$9,365
Career Prize Money
$541,225
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Eric Quigley vs Peter Polansky For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Quigley VS Polansky
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Eric Quigley | Peter Polansky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 26 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:17 | 1:55:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (99/189) | 56% (100/180) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (64/99) | 71% (71/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (48/90) | 50% (40/80) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 37% (7/19) | 47% (8/17) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (69/180) | 41% (77/189) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 0-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Eric Quigley
Player
Peter Polansky
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
90)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 2-6 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Eric Quigley
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
43%
(
40 of
92)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eric Quigley | Peter Polansky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Eric Quigley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Eric Quigley
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Harrison
Player
Eric Quigley
69%
(
83 of
121)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
John Lamble
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Eric Quigley
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
12
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Dominik Koepfer
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Eric Quigley
79%
(
67 of
85)
1st Serve %
50%
(
59 of
118)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
10
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
25 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Keegan Smith
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Eric Quigley
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Eric Quigley
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Polansky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Jc Aragone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Peter Polansky
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 7-6(2) 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Peter Polansky
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Quigley Vs Polansky Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Quigley are available here and Polansky photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
